Eva Marti


High level of activities in the Emergency Room requires certain patient sorting system. Role of the triage system in emergency service is to determine which patients who need urgent care the most. Patients’ lenght of stay in the Emergency Room can be used as one of the indicators to evaluate clinical urgency of the patients treated by triage. The study used quantitative method with crosssectional observational analytic design. The purpose of the study was to describe the correlation between the patients’ triage level and their length of stay in the Emergency Room. The researcher analyzed the medical records of the 374 patients admitted to  Emergency Room in the first and second week of August 2015 in order to find out their triage level and length of stay in the Emergency Room. Bivariate analysis, particularly the Sperman’s-Rho analysis, was used to describe the correlation between each triage category and the length of stay in the Emergency Room. Based on the bivariate analysis, it was found that p  <  0.00  (<  0.05)  and the correlation coefficient was 0.327.  The conclusion was based on the statistical analysis, there was significant correlation between triage level and length of stay in the Emergency Room and the level of significance was 0.327.

Full Text:



Bullard, M. J., Unger, B., Spence, J., Grafstein, E., & Group, t. C. N. W. (2009). Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triase and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. CJEM, 10(2).

Chi, C.-H., & Huang, C.-M. (2006). Comparison of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the Taiwan Triase System in Predicting Resource Utilization. J Formos Med Assoc 105, 617-625.

Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia . (2012). Pedoman Pelayanan IGD

Dreyer, J. F., McLeod, S. L., Anderson, C. K., Carter, M. W., & Zaric, G. S. (2009). Physician workload and the Canadian

Emergency Department Triase and Acuity Scale: the Predictors ofWorkload in the Emergency Room (POWER) Study. CJEM, 11(2). Emergency Nurse Association (2012)Triase Qualification

Graff, I., Goldschmidt, B., Glien, P., Bogdanow, M., Fimmers, R., Hoeft, A., et al. (2014). The German Version of the Manchester Triase System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability. PLOS ONE, 9(2).

Gravel, J., Manzano, S., & Arsenault, M. (2009). Validity of the Canadian Paediatric Triase and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care hospital. CJEM, 11 (1).

Gilboy, N. (2007). Triase. In L. Newberry & L. M. Criddle (Eds.), Sheehys Manual of Emergency Care (Vol. 6, pp. 61-81). Illnois: Elsevier Mosby.

Ng, C.-J., Hsu, K.-H., Kuan, J.-T., Chiu, T.-F., Wei-Kong Chen, Lin, H.-J., et al. (2010). Comparison Between Canadian Triase and Acuity Scale and Taiwan Triase System in Emergency Departments. Journal of the

Formosan Medical Association, 109(11), 828– 837.

Seiger, N., Veen, M. v., Almeida, H., Steyerberg, E. W., Meurs, A. H. J. v., Carneiro, R., et al. (2014). Improving the Manchester Triase System for Pediatric Emergency Care: An International Multicenter Study. PLOS ONE 9(1).

Vlahaki, D., & Milne, W. K. (2009). Meeting Canadian EmergencyDepartment Triase and Acuity Scale benchmarks in a rural emergency department. Can J Rural Med 14 (3).

Warren, Gafni, A., & Goldman, R. D. (2008). Correlation of the Canadian Pediatric Emergency Triase and Acuity Scale to ED resource utilization. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 26, 893–897.

Wacebnm. (2011). TRIASE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [Electronic Version], from au/workshops/Triase.pdf


  • There are currently no refbacks.