PARADOXES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: State Defense Program Anomaly

Akhmad Juni Toa, Samsul Maarif, Rachmat Hidayat

Abstract


ABSTRACT

This paper carries out an in-depth review of the implementation of state defense policies in Situbondo so far which is still not optimal. To conduct in-depth research in this paper the researcher uses qualitative research with a porposive approach in order to obtain valid, in-depth and proportional information. The results of the study concluded that: First, the implementation of state defense policy in Situbondo Regency is still not optimal in achieving its stated goals, because there is a paradox in its implementation. This paradox arises because in the implementation of state defense policies top down and ignores local potential, such as the role of charismatic kiai - social capital - which has a strong influence in the Situbondo community so far, so that it has a direct impact on the creation of regional stability, as one of the objectives of national defense. Secondly, because there is a paradox in the implementation of the country's defense policy, it eventually gave birth to an anomaly in the National Defense Program because the Ministry of Defense on one hand wanted the birth of as many national defense cadres, in order to maintain the country's existence from various threats. But on the other hand, in its implementation the Ministry of Defense is exclusive by ignoring the role of the kiai as a very important social capital in the area in encouraging the optimization of the State Defender Program in Situbondo.


Full Text:

PDF

References


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agustino, Leo. 2008. Dasar- dasar Kebijakan Publik. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Bungin, B. 2012. Metode Penelitian Sosial: Format-Format Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Surabaya : Airlangga University Press.

Bowditch, L James dan A.F. Buono. 1990. A Primer On Organisational Behavioral. 2nd Edition. New York. Willey.Inc.

Creswell, John W. 2012. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Coleman, James, S. 1989. Social Capital in Creation of Human Capital. University of Chicago Press.

Dunn, William. 2003. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gadjah Mada University Press:Yogyakarta.

Frederickson, H.George. 1996. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Field, John. 2010. Modal Sosial. Terjemahan Nurhadi. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana.

Grindle, Merilee S., (ed), 1980, Politics and Apolicy Implementation in the Third World. New Jersey: Princetown University Press.

Glaser, B.G. dan A.L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine de Gruyter Inc., New York.

Hanifan, L. J. 1999. The Rural School Community Centre. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 67, 130-38.

Henry, Nicholas. 1988. Public Administration and Public Affair (Administrasi Negara dan Masalah-Masalah Publik). Terjemahan Luciana Lontoh. Jakarta: PT Raja Grasindo Persada.

Hobbes, Thomas. 1987. Leviathan diedit oleh J.C.A. Gaskin, Oxford University Press Inc, New York.

Keban, Yeremias T. 2004. Indikator Kinerja Pemda, Pendekatan Manajemen dan Kebijakan. Yogyakarta : Fisip UGM.

KBBI, 2016. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). [Online] Available at: http://kbbi.web.id/pusat, [Diakses 21 Maret 2020].

Lang, Robert T., dan Steven P. Hornburg, 1998. What is Social Capital and Why Is it important to Public Policy, Housing Policy Debate, Volume 9, Issue 1, Fannie Mae Foundation.

Madani, M. 2011. Dimensi Interaksi Aktor dalam Perumusan Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Mustopadidjaja. 2003. Kebijakan Negara Dunia Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Moleong, j, Lexy. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Syahra, Rusydi. 2003. Modal Sosial: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, Vol 5 (1): 1-22.

Soenarko. 2000. Public Policy: Pengertian Pokok untuk Memahami dan Analisa Kebijaksanaan Pemerintah. Surabaya. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Triandis, H. C. 1990. Cross-cultural Studies of Individualism-Collectivism. In J. Berman (ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (pp.41-133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Portes, A. 1998. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology.

Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Riggs, F. W. 1996. The Ecology of Public Administration. New York: Asian Publishing House.

Winarno, Budi. 2007. Kebijakan Publik, Teori dan Proses. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.

Woolcock, M. 1998. Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework. Theory and Society 27(2): 151-208.

Laws and regulations

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.

Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara.

Instruksi Presiden Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Bela Negara Tahun 2018-2019.

Peraturan Menteri Pertahanan No 32 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Pembinaan Kesadaran Bela Negara.

Website

http://www.cnnindonesia.com/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/politico.v20i2.3618

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 POLITICO

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats
slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor