BIROGOG : THE CRITICS OF GENERAL INTEREST AGENT IN INDONESIA

M Nurulloh Bestami, Nurul Istiqomah, Fathur Rahman

Abstract


Seventy-three years Indonesia had been free from the shackles of colonialism after the second world war, but until now the goal of Indonesian people to advance general welfare hasn’t been able to be carried out fairly by governance bureaucrats. Distortions of universal interest or general interest through the public services which should be the main orientation of the state often occur due to the behavior of bureaucrats in Indonesia who tend to act cooperatively only on particular interests like Marx's criticism of Hegel regarding the role of bureaucrats. In fact, universal interest is the main instrument to create the general welfare. The rampant of discriminatory treatment towards certain class communities just aggravate the pathology of bureaucracy in Indonesia. As a result, the bureaucrats as agent of universal interest now they can’t afford to be fair and do their job as well as agent of general interest. It’s causing that bureaucrats are more suitable to be called “Birogog” which means bad office leaders. Keyword : Birogog, Interest, Agent

Full Text:

PDF

References


Martini, Rina. 2012. Buku Ajar Birokrasi dan Politik. Semarang : UPT UNDIP Press Semarang

Saebani, Ahmad Beni., dan Zia Rahman. 2016. Ilmu Negara dan Teori Negara. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Rini, Sarwo. 2018. Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Administrasi dalam Undang Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Nugroho, Riant. 2017. Public Policy. Jakarta: Gramedia .

Republik Indonesia. 2013. Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2013, No. 232. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta. Suwarno. 2008. Birokrasi Indonesia: Perspektif Teoritik dan Pengalaman Empirik. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Unisia/article/view/2693/2480. Accessed on April 18, 2019 at 21.34 WIB.

Kamarni, Neng. 2011. Analisis Pelayanan Publik Terhadap Masyarakat (Kasus Pelayanan Kesehatan di Kabupaten Agam. http://journal.unitas-pdg.ac.id/downlotfile.php?file=5.%20Analisis%20pelayanan%20publik%20terhadap%20masyarakat%20_kasus%20pelayanan%20kesehatan%20di%20kabupaten%20agam_.pdf. Accessed on April 18, 2019 at 22.52 WIB.

Hiariej, Eric. 2003. Teori Negara Marxis. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/11075/8316. Accessed on April 19, 2019 at 19.37 WIB.

Fitriani, Ida. 2017. Evaluasi Kebijakan E-KTP dalam Mewujudkan Mutu Pelayanan Masyarakat di Kelurahan Pelampang Kecamatan Mampang Prapatan Kota Administrasi Jakarta Selatan.

Putra, Aji YK. 2018. Mau Cepat Bikin e-KTP di Sumsel Harus Rela Bayar Pungli Rp 300.000. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/05/03/18222981/mau-cepat-bikin-e-ktp-di-sumsel-harus-rela-bayar-pungli-rp-300000. Accessed on April 13, 2019 at 19.50 WIB.

Nurhayat. 2019. Warga yang Belum Rekam E-KTP Tersisa 3,4 Juta Orang. https://indopos.co.id/read/2019/04/02/170329/warga-yang-belum-rekam-e-ktp-tersisa-34-juta-orang. Accessed on April 15, 2019 at 13.38 WIB.

BBC News. 2018. Kasus E-KTP: Setya Novanto dituntut 16 tahun penjara, denda, dan pencabutan hak politik lima tahun. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-43579739. Accessed on April 10, 2019 at 15.00 WIB.

Paath, Carlos KY. 2018. Jumlah ASN di Indonesia 4.351.490 Orang. https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/515506/jumlah-asn-di-indonesia-4351490-orang. Accessed on April 10, 2019 at 13.35 WIB.

Prasetyo, Wishnu Bagus. 2018. IMD World Competitiveness 2018, Peringkat RI Turun Jadi 43. https://www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/495733/imd-world-competitiveness-2018-peringkat-ri-turun-jadi-43. Accessed on April 11, 2019 at 10.43 WIB.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/pi.v0i0.2509

Copyright (c) 2019 Prosiding ICOGISS 2019