PERDAGANGAN BILATERAL (INDONESIA-CINA) PADA INDUSTRI TEKSTIL DAN PRODUK TEKSTIL
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Trade or exchange may be interpreted as a process of exchange based on the voluntary will of each party. Each party shall have the freedom to determine the profit and loss of such exchanges, in the light of their respective interests and then determine whether or not to exchange or not (Boediono, 2000). The textile industry which is currently the mainstay product of Indonesian exports, is basically a series of integral production processes from upstream industry, middle to downstream industries. Upstream industrial output will be an input for more downstream industries (Anwar and Aziz, 1987: 118). Analysis of the textile industry in Indonesia in this study will only look at the development of four types of branches of the textile industry, namely fiber making industry, spinning industry, weaving industry and apparel industry. The type of data in this study is secondary data and in the form of time series data that can be obtained from the study of literature of Bank Indonesia, Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS), as well as search on various internet sites. Periodasi data in this research is during the period of 2000-2013.
This analysis will be applied to the textile product and textile product (TPT) product group based on International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) 321 which will be converted into Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) 651, 659, 845, 846. Based on the analysis data and discussion described in chapter 4, conclusions are obtained: Intra-textile trade intensity between Indonesia and Cina, 2000-2013 based on ISIC 321 category (textile industry) is obtained between Indonesia and Cina with intra-industry trade category , because the overall index of intra-industry trade was 53.9%;
Keywords: IIT, Bilateral Trade, Textile Industry and Textile ProductsFull Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar, M. A. dan Aziz, I. J. (1987). Prospek Ekonomi Indonesia dan Sumber
Pembiayaannya. Jakarta: UI-PRESS.
Appleyard, D. R., and Field, A. J. (1995). International Economics.2th ed.
Chicago.
Arief, S. (1993). Metode Penelitian Ekonomi. Jakarta: UI Press.
Arifin,S. (2008). Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN 2015. Jakarta: PT.Elex Media
Komputindo.
Aturupane, C., S. Djankov & B. Hoekman. (1997). “Determinant of Intra-Industry
Trade between East and West Europe”, JEL Clasiffication. F.13: 423-
Boediono. (1983). Teori Moneter. Edisi Tiga. Yogyakarta: BPFE - UGM. Boediono. (1990). Ekonomi Internasional. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Boediono, (2000). Teori Moneter. Edisi Enam. Yogyakarta: BPFE - UGM.
Biro Pusat Statistik. (2000). “Statistik Perdagangan Luar Negeri Indonesia/Jilid
II/ Ekspor”. Laporan Tahunan 2000-2013. Jakarta: BPS.
Frankel dan Rose. (2002). An Estimate of The Effect of Common Currency on Trade and Income. [Serial Online]. http://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/jurnal-ekonomi. [02 Februari 2017].
Johnson, W. (2011). Trade Liberalization and Interindustry Reallocation in
Indonesia.[Serial Online]. www.vanderbilt.edu/. [05 Februari 2017]
Oktaviani, Widyastutik dan Tanti Novianti. (2008). Integrasi Perdagangan dan Dinamika Ekspor Indonesia ke Timur Tengah.[Serial Online]. http://pascaie.ipb.ac.id/doc/jurnal5.pdf. [01 Februari 2018]
Rahutami, I. A. dan Kusumastuti, S. Y. (Tanpa Tahun).Dampak Volatilitas Nilai Tukar Terhadap Arus Perdagangan Indonesia (Pendekatan ARDL- ECM).[Serial Online].
http://epserv.unila.ac.id/.../A.%20Ika%20Rahutami%20-
%20Yani%20Kusumastutii.pdf. [15 Februari 2018].
Saidin. M. (Tanpa Tahun). Pengaruh Perdagangan bebas ASEAN-China Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia.[Serial Online]. https://masrianisaidin.wordpress.com/pengaruh-perdagangan-bebas-
asean-china-acfta-terhadap-perekomian-indonesia/. [01 Maret 2018].
Copyright (c) 2018 PROSIDING EKONOMI KREATIF DI ERA DIGITAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.