Banal Politik Transaksional Para Pemilih (Tinjauan Psikologis)

Haressa Lintang Rizkika, Hikmatul Ummah, Aidina Winona Raider, Erna Ipak Rahmawati

Abstract


Organizing a democratic party - general election (Election) - in Indonesia today is no stranger to the term 'money politics' or transactional politics.  Ideally, a political choice in a democratic party is based on an interest in the candidate's vision and mission or based on shared ideology and is carried out in accordance with the values and norms that exist in society.  But in fact, transactional politics have been commonplace from the biggest political event to the lowest level or in other terms to be 'banal' or considered normal in our society.  This study uses a qualitative approach with a phenomenological study in which the results are a description of the psychological dynamics of transactional political actors in this case the voters.  The results obtained that in the review of the dynamics field theory of the principals began with a motivation symbolized as a V (Vector) towards the goal in the form of money without significant obstacles or permeable bondaries in the psychological environment of the research subject.  In the typology of the personal living space symbolized as (P) believing that;  1) Giving is considered a representation of prosocial actions;  2) Giving is something that is considered not violating the values and norms of individuals and society;  3) Individuals have the resources and opportunity to conduct transactional politics.


Keywords


transactional political banal; psychology; field theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Alwisol, M. (2013). Psikologi kepribadian. Malang: Universitas Muhammyadiah Malang.

Abidin,Z.,&A.G.P. Siswandi. 2015. Psikologi Korupsi. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Beritasatu. 2014. KPK : 71% Masyarakat Politik Uang Itu Wajar. https://id.beritasatu.com/home/kpk-71-masyarakat-anggap-politik-uang-wajar/80596. diakses 28 Desember 201.

Hutomo, Radityo Rizki. 2014. Perilaku Memilih Warga Surabaya Dalam Pemilu Legislatif 2014 (Hubungan Kesuaian Program Kandidat, Kampanye, Identifikasi Partai dan Pemberian Imbalan Uang dalam Menentukan Pilihan Partai Politik dalam Pemilu Legislatif 2014). Jurnal Politik Muda, Vol. 4 No. 1, Januari - Maret 2015, 50 - 60

Irawan,dkk. 2014. Korupsi Pemilu. Jakarta: ICW.

Kartono, K. (2015). Patologi sosial jilid 1. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

KPU, Bandung Barat. 2014. Laporan Riset : Politik Uang pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014 di Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Bandung : KPU.

LIP.2013. Laporan Konpers Rilis Survei Sikap dan Perilaku Pemilih terhadap Money Politics. http://www.indikator.co.id/news/details/1/41/Laporan-Konpers-Rilis-Survei-Sikap-dan-Perilaku-Pemilih-terhadap-Money-Politics-. Diakses 28 Desember 2018.

LSI.2014. Persepsi dan Opini Publik terhadap Penyelenggara Pemilu. http://www.lsi.or.id/riset/433/Opini_Publik_thdp_penyelenggara_PEMILU. Diakses 29 Desember 2018.

Moleong, J. (2017). Lexy. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT Rosdakarya.

Muhtadi, B. (2013). Politik Uang dan Dinamika Elektoral Di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Awal Interaksi Antara “Party-Id” dan Patron-Klien. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10(1), 17.

Purwantari, B. I. Mempertanyakan Banalitas Korupsi. Kompas, 30/8/2010.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/ins.v15i2.2094

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Insight : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats