ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY AND SOCIETY MODEL IN THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CHANGE IN WAJO REGENCY
Abstract
The aims of the study are to explain, to analyze, and to find a relationship model between government bureaucracy and society in the process of social and political change in Wajo regency. Data collection methods used in this study were Focus Group Discussion (FGD), documentation, intensive interaction, in depth interview and other instruments. Samples were selected by purposive and snowball methods. Informants in this study are both from internal and external bureaucracy. Internal bureaucracy informants consisted of; (1) strategic apex (top-level management), (2) middle line (chief executive), (3) operating core (executant), while the external bureaucracy informants can be classified into four groups; (1) local elite which consist of local figures and its stakeholders within the area, (2) modern elite, consists of scholars, teachers, headmasters and retired government official, (3) religion elite, consists of head of Islamic-boarding-school and ustadz, (4) community elite consists of non-governmental organization, youth leaders, women and even fisherman leaders. The results of the study provide an explanation of the relationship between the local bureaucracy with the local community, which was forming 4 (four) relationship models namely (1) Adaptive Model, (2) Accommodative Model, (3) Humanist Model, and (4) Tiered Elite Model. The most popular model of society is the Humanist model. Tiered Elite Model, on the other hand, creates pseudo harmony and put bureaucracy under the pressure of the hidden hand. There are three basic models and AAH model which consists of adaptive, accommodative and humanist is the preferred one. These four models can become theories in the context of a harmonious relationship between the government bureaucracy and society in the process of social and political change. These theories can be a source of inspiration in any social relationship that supports every harmonious social relationship.
Keywords: local government bureaucracy, adaptive, humanist, elite.Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, M.Syukur. 1985. Birokrasi dan Pemangunan Nasional: Studi Tentang Peranan Birokrasi Lokal dalam Implemntasi Program Program Pembangunan di Sulawesi Selatan. Unpublished. Ujung Pandang. Hasanuddin University.
Abdullah, M.Syukur. 1986. Birokrasi dan Pembangunan Nasional: Studi tentang Peranan Lokal dalam Implementasi Program-Program Pembangunan di Sulawesi Selatan. Unpublished. Hasanuddin University
Abidin,Zaenal. 1985. Wajo, Abad XV-XVI Suatu Penggalian Sejarah Terpendam Sulawesi Selatan dari Lontara. Bandung. Penerbit Alumni
Albrow, Martin. 1990. Max Webber’s Construction of Social Theory. London. Macmilallan
____________.1996. Birokrasi, (Terjemahan: M. Rusli Karim dan Totok Daryanto). Jogjakarta. PT.Tiara Wacana
Arifin, Indar. 2010. Birokrasi Pemerintahan dan Perubahan Sosial. Makassar. Pustaka Refleksi
Arifin, Anwar. 1986. Komunikasi dan Perubagan Sosial. Ujung Pandang. Kelompok Penulis Ikhtiar
Barzelay, Michaels. 1992. Breacking Trough Bureacracy, Berkeley, Los Angeles. Oxford. University of California Press
Blau, M.Peter & Marshall W. Meyer, 1987, Birokrasi dalam Masyarakat Modern, (terjemahan oleh, Gary R.Yusuf) Jakarta UI Press
Bethan, David. 1990. Translation of:Sahar Simomora.) Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.
Bilhartz, Peter, 2002. Teori Teori Sosual: Observai Kritis Terhadap Para Filosofis Terkemuka(Terejemahan oleh Sigit Jatmiko). Yogjakarta. Pustaka Pelajar
Budi Santoso. Priyo. 1995. Birokrasi Pemerintahan Orde Baru, Perspektif Kultural dan Struktural. Jakarta. CV Rajawali
Dwidjowito. Riant Nugroho. 2000. Organisasi Publik Masa Depan, Redefinisis Peran Pemerintah Jakarta. PerPot.
Durkheim, Emilie. 1964. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York. Free Press
_________ . 2000. Otonomi Daerah: Desetralisasi Tanpa Revolusi. Jakarta. Elex Gramedia.
_________ . 2003 Reinventing Pembangunan: Menata Ulang Paradigma Pembangunan Untuk Membangun Indonesia Baru dengan Keunggulan Global. Jakarta. Elex media Komputindo.
Fay, Brian. 1991. Teori Sosial dan Praktek Politk. Jakarta. jakarta Pustaka.
_________. 2002. Filsafat Ilmu Sosial Kontemporer, (terjemahan: M.Muhith). Jogjakarta, jendela dan Tadarus.
Gertz, Cliggot. 1980. Abangan, santri, Priyai dalam Masyarakat Jawa (translated by: Aswib Mahasin) Jakarta. Pustaka Jaya.
Haris Syamsuddin dkk. 2000. Birokrasi dan Demokratisasi, Pengalaman Indonesia dan Thailand, Jakarta. PPW-LIPI
Hegel and Friedrick, George Wilhelm. 1953. Philosophie of Right. London. Oxford University Press
Karim Rusli. 1982. Seluk Beluk Perubahan Sosial. Surabaya. Usaha Nasional.
Khu, S.Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientefic Revolutions. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press
Lauer, Robert H. 2001. Perspektif Tentang Perubahan Sosial (Translated by; Alimandab). Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Mahardika, Timur. 2006. Strategi Membuka Jalan Perubahan. Bantul. Pondok Edukasi.
Mac Iver, Robert. 1954. The Web of Government. New York. The Macmillan Company
______________. 1955. The Modern State. London. Oxford University Press.
Muluk, Khairul. 2005. Desentralisasi & Pemerintahan Daerah. Malang. __________
Nawawi, Juanda. 2004. Analisis Desentralisasi dan Kinerja Pelayanan Publik di Kabupaten Wajo, (Unpublished Dessertation). Makassar. Hasanuddin University
Osborn, Read Gablear. 1996. Mewirausahakan Demokrasi (Translated by: Abdul Sorsyid). Jakarta. Pustaka Binaman Apressido
Sutiastini, dkk. 2003. Managemen Sumberdaya Manusia, Konsep, Teori, dan Pengembangan dalam Konteks Organisasi Publik. Yogjakarta. Gaya Media
Thoha, Miftah. 2002. Perspektif Perilaku Birokrasi. Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada
Weber, Max. 1947. Essays in. New York. Oxford University Press
Weber, Max. 1958. The Methodology of The Social Science. New York. Free Press
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/pi.v0i0.2546
Copyright (c) 2019 Prosiding ICOGISS 2019