MONEY POLITICS IN PAMEKASAN REGENCY

Abstract

Democracy in the context of state life is the best political and government system. Almost all modern countries accept the absolute need for democracy to be upheld. The implementation of the democratic system in Indonesia is not fully implemented according to the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. One of them is the General Election (Election) which is still full of the practice of money politics. The fundamental essence of each action of money politics can be seen from the mechanistic process or procedure and juridical. According to deliberative democracy it is implied in what is said to be practical discourse, the formation of political opinions and aspirations (politische meinung-und willenbildung), proceduralism or popular sovereignty as a procedure (volksouveranitat als verfahren). Deliberative theory in a model is interested in the issue of validity of collective decisions, namely the procedure for producing rules. Deliberative theory in a model is interested in the issue of validity of collective decisions, namely the procedure for producing rules. The practices of money politics played or played in each of the elections, are indicated by the development of a discursive, spatial model of money politics in opinions - between money politics and general elections which can be regarded as' the results of public use of communicative rights ".
Keywords: Mechanistic process, juridical, political aspirations