INVESTIGATING IT GOVERNANCE VALIDITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION: An Empirical Study

Wheny Khristianto

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to investigate the validity of the higher education academic staffs in IT governance studies and the future improvement for IT governance and controls. This research used a quantitative survey to identify the current state of IT governance for five higher education institutions in East Java, Indonesia. The questionnaires were distributed to post-graduate student as IT executives in their higher education institution. A total of 34 out of 40 post academic staffs completed the questionnaire, representing a response rate of 85 percent. This study found that attributes for deliver value (V2), attainment and retain people with key competencies (V6), capture knowledge to improve performance (V10), stakeholder satisfaction (V11), reach economies of scale (V17) , deliver successul IT project (V19), understand business unit strategies (V20), and understand emerging technologies (V22) show no significant difference (p <0.05) between mean interests and performance. In addition to these, other 15 attributes show significant differences in the t-test in the negative direction. This points to the fact that actual control of IT governance in colleges is monitored less than expected. Therefore, five higher education institutions in East Java should pay more attention to the identified attributes important to balance the gap between the importance and performance of these attributes.

Keywords: IT governance, IT governance balanced scorecard, Importance-performance analysis, higher education institution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu-Musa, A.A. 2007. Exploring Information Technology Governance (ITG) in Developing Countries: An Empirical Study. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, Vol. 7, N. 13-14, 2007, pp. 73-118.

Amado, C. A., Santos, S. P., and Marques, P. M. 2012. Integrating the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Balanced Scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 390-403.

Aubert, B., Cohendet, P., Da Silva, L., Grandadam, D., Guimaron, J., and Montreuil, B. (2010). L’innovation et les technologies de l’Information et des communications. Centre sur la productivité et la prospérité (HEC Montréal), & CEFRIO.

Borousan, E., Hojabri.R., Manafi, M., and Hooman, A. 2011. Balanced Scorecard; a Equipment for Measuring and Modifying IT Governance in Healthcare Organizations. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 141-146.

Brown, R., 2008. Higher education and the market. Perspectives: Policy Practice Higher Educ. Vol. 12, pp. 78–83.

Erek, K. 2011. From green IT to sustainable information systems management: Managing and measuring sustainability in IT organizations. In Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-16.

Gaspar, D. and Mabic, M. 2015. Creativity in higher education. Universal J. Educ. Res. Vol. 3, No. 9, pp. 598–605.

Gartner. 2006. Defining IT governance: Roles and relationships ITGI (IT Governance Institute). Board briefing on IT governance.

Gibbs, P., and Barnett, R., 2014. Thinking about higher education. Thinking About Higher Education.

Haerani, R. 2017. Mengukur Tingkat Kinerja Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi di Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan IT Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Vol. 4, hal. 25-28.

Hoidn, S., and Kärkkäinen, K., 2014. Promoting Skills for Innovation in Higher Education. OECD Education Working Papers, (100), 0_1,1,5–61.

ITGI. 2003. Board Briefing on IT Governance. IT Governance Insitute.

Konsynski, B., and Tiwana, A. 2004. The improvisation efficiency paradox in inter-firm electronic networks: governance and architecture considerations. Journal of Information Technology, 1Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 234-243.

Liu, T. W., and Piccoli, G. 2007. Degrees of agility: implications for information systems design and firm strategy. Agile information systems: Conceptualization, construction, and management, pp. 122-133

Mathew, V., 2010. Service delivery through knowledge management in higher education.

Journal of Knowledge Management Practice 11, 1–16.

Martilla, J.A. and James, J.C. 1977. Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 77-79.

Meek, L., Teichler, U., and Kearney, M., 2009. Higher Education, Research and Innovation: Changing Dynamics. Report on the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge. International Centre for Higher Education Research.

Misbah, Hadi, S.P., dan Nugroho, E. 2017. Penerapan Information Technology Balanced scorecard (IT BSC) Pada Perancangan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja COBIT 5. Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi, Jakarta, hal. 1-7, Jakarta.

OECD, 2009. Higher Education to 2030. Higher Education, Vol. 2.

Prabowo, H. 2007. Implementasi IT Balanced Scorecard di Perguruan Tinggi. Seminar

Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2007 (SNATI 2007), J-59-J-62, Yogyakarta.

Rosemann, M. 2001. Evaluating the management of enterprise systems with the Balanced Scorecard. Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Management, pp. 171-184.

Solechan, A. 2015. Tata Kelola Kinerja Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan IT Balanced Scorecard (Studi Pada STMIK Provinsi Semarang). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, Vol. 6, No. 2, hal.61-66.

Van Grembergen, W. and Van Bruggen, R. 1997. Measuring and improving corporate

information technology through the balanced scorecard technique. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on the Evaluation of Information technology, pp. 163-171).

Van Grembergen, W., Saull, R., and De Haes, S. 2003. Linking the IT balanced scorecard to the business objectives at a major Canadian financial group. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 23-50.

Van Grembergen, W. and Saull, R. 2001. Aligning business and information technology through the balanced scorecard at a major Canadian financial group: its status measured with an IT BSC maturity model. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, IEEE, pp. 1-10.

Wijsman, T., Neelissen, P. and Wauters, C. 2007. IT governance in the public sector: ‘Top-priority’. The INTOSAI IT Journal, 25:20-29.

Zhu, C., 2015. Organisational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 65–79.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/pi.v0i0.2494

Copyright (c) 2019 Prosiding ICOGISS 2019

slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor