Keabsahan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Digantungkan Pada Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Abstract
The sale and purchase binding agreement is a legal breakthrough that was born out of the needs of the community. Used by the parties as a preliminary agreement because it has not been able to fulfill the conditions to carry out the sale and purchase before the officials of the land deed. However, in practice, binding of sale and purchase agreement is made not because of the sale and purchase transaction but as debt guarantee which the debtor plays as the seller and the creditor as the buyer. So the problem is how the legitimacy of binding agreement of sale and purchase as well as the sale power suspended as debt guarantee? then what is the basis of legal considerations for judges in deciding cases binding sale and purchase agreement that hung as debt guarantee ?. This research is a normative juridical research by using approach of legislation, concept and case. From the result of the research, it is concluded that the deed made by the parties before the notary is valid as an authentic deed which has been in accordance with the legislation, and the sale power is a unity in the sale and purchase agreement, where the seller authorizes the buyer to do duty rather than an authorizer. The sale power made by the parties is also an authentic deed and not an absolute authority prohibited by the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14/ 1982 because it does not contain an element of transfer of rights. Based on several considerations of the judge, it can be deduced that as long as the deed of sale and purchase agreement of sale and sale has been made and executed legally as authentic deed which has perfect evidentiary power, then the deed can not be canceled.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Hatta, Sri Gambir Melati. (2000). Beli Sewa Sebagai Perjanjian Tak Bernama: Pandangan Masyarakat dan Sikap Mahkamah Agung Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni
Hernoko, Agus Yudha. (2000). Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Meliala, Djaja. (1982). Pemberian Kuasa Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Tarsito
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. (1990). Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
P.N.K, Simanjuntak. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan
Pradjodikoro, Wirjono. (2000). Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Sumur
________, (2001). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta, Intermasa, 2001.
Widjaya, I.G Rai, Merancang Suatu Kontrak: Contract Drafting Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Megapoin
Tesis atau Disertasi
Sidi Alkahfi Setiawan. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Pemegang Saham Di PT Bank Central Asia Tbk. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember
Eka Udiana dalam tesisnya. (2009). Eksistensi Kuasa Menjual dalam PPJB. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga
Indradi Prajanto dalam tesisnya. (2016). Formulasi Bentuk Komparisi Akta Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dalam Harta Bersama untuk Menjaga dan Memenuhi Ketentuan Asas Nemo Plus Juris Transfere Potest Quam Ipse Habel, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Atma Jaya
Muhamad Satria dalam disertasinya. (2014). Prinsip IktikadBaik dalam PPJB Hak Atas Tanah, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga.
Didik Endro Purwoleksono. (2017). Tiga Kondisi Seseorang Tidak Mendapat Perlindungan Hukum, disampaikan pada mata kuliah Hukum Pidana Jabatan Notaris, 10 Oktober 2017.
Daftar Putusan
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 130/PDT/2004/PT.DKI tanggal 10 Juni 2004.
Putusan Mahakamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor : 661.K/Pdt/2009 tanggal 28 Februari 2011.
Putusan Mahakamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor : 3037.K/Pdt/2013 tanggal 25 Maret 2014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/faj.v17i1.2210
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
View My Stats