UN: TO BE CONTINUED OR ABORTED?
Abstract
One of the qualities of education concerns with content standard. The implementation of the standard is the form of the issuance of Permen (Minister of Education’s Decree) number 22 and 23/2006 which becomes the basis of conducting the teaching learning at school including its evaluation. UN (National Exams) as the final form of the evaluation has been expected to be the measurement of the students’ achievement of the cotent standard. But the con-troversies arise to respond the implementation of UN. However, UN is supposed to be the most valid and de-pendable form of measurement of the content standard of students’ achievement and of scool.
Keywords: UN (National Exams), highstakes test, content standard
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alam, S. 2008. Instrumen Ujian Nasional sebagai Penentu Kelulu-san Berpotensi Merugikan Siswa. (on line) (http://www. duniaesai.com/pendidikan/) (retrieved on December 2008)
Brown, James Dean. 2000. University Entrance Examinations: Strategies for Creating Positive Washback on English language teaching in Japan. Shiken: JALT Testing & Eva-luation SIG Newsletter.Vol. 3 No. 2 Jan. 2000 (p. 4 - 8). (online) (www.jalt.org/test/bro_5.htm) (retrieved on December 15, 2008).
Hopkins, D. Kenneth., Julian C Stanley and B.R. Hopkins. 1990. Educational and Psychological Measurement and Eva-luation. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allys and Bacon.
Irawan, Ade. 2007. Menimbang Ulang Kebijakan Ujian Nasional. Koran Tempo, 17 April 2007. (online) (www.unisosdem. org) (accessed on December 8, 2008).
Koalisi Pendidikan Bandung. 50 Juta Rupiah per Sekolah untuk Persiapan UN. (online) (Kompas.com.)( accessed on December 8, 2008.)
Komunitas Pendidikan Papua. 5.50 Standar Ujian Nasional 2009. 21 Desember 2008. (online) (Papuapos.com.) (accessed on May 27, 2009)
Maliki, Z. 2009. Kenaikan Standar Kelulusan Unas. Jawa Pos, Sabtu 3 Januari 2009.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.